Go Back   Ultimate Nurse > Nursing Discussion Forums > Nursing News
Register

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-20-2007, 10:17 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN JOSE
Posts: 169
Angry We're All at Walter Reed

....neglent,inadequate funding,and privatization.... :whipping: http://www.calnurse.org/media-center...temID=29839835
mared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 11:13 AM   #2
aKa MagRedC5
 
SoldierNurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Universal City [San Antonio], TX
Posts: 1,288
Send a message via AIM to SoldierNurse
Proud to be an Army Nurse!

"The Bush Administration can fire a general or two, but until it shows the same commitment to caring for the war wounded and the rest of our nation's health that it does in waging war, Walter Reed will just be another name on a growing list of shame."

Deborah Burger, RN
Huffington Post
March 6, 2007

IMHO, Burger is another liberal democrat spouting anti-Bush sentiment and using the bad WRAMC publicity for a platform towards her own agenda.

Let me assure everyone the acute healthcare provided to active duty & their dependents, retirees & their dependents, as well as the medically boarded is TOP NOTCH, at least at Madigan Army Medical Center, Ft Lewis, WA. I have seen nothing but outstanding healthcare provided in the Intensive Care Units and Stepdown Units where my wife & I work.

I'm thankful not to be PCS at Walter Reed! WRAMC is slated under BRAC in the future to be dissolved and the area healthcare duties to be taken over by Bethesda [National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland]. IMHO, this dissolvement would be a huge mistake, but what do I know I'm just a Company Grade Army Nurse Corps officer. Anyway, it stands to reason, although not a legitimate alibi, that the barracks housing the medical hold Soldiers would get ignored of needed upgrades in lieu of pending dissolvement. Is this the direct fault of MG Weightman? I seriously doubt it! Is it not Congress that holds back $$$ for the DoD? Or, is it the liberal democrats that don't have a clue? IMHO, the VA system as a whole needs some looking into, as well.

In the wake of the continuing scandal over the housing and medical evaluation process for wounded service members at WRAMC, House and Senate Democrats have unveiled a sweeping bill promising comprehensive reforms of how combat veterans and their families are treated. The Dignity for Wounded Warriors Act; the bill would mandate housing standards for the wounded, overhaul disability review boards, require one caseworker for every 20 recovering service members, extend job protections for service members to include family members who are at their side during recovery, demand that an ombudsmen be available around the clock by phone and in any hospital with more than 100 patients, and create a new independent oversight board to monitor how recovering service members are treated.

The Dignity for Wounded Warriors Act is an opportunity for the Democrats to shine, or save face. I say save face because w/o the funds, or manpower we at the local level have our proverbial hands tied behind our back. Regardless, I do support such a bill, no matter who is doing the backing. However, the problem is not just at the Army Medical Centers! A shortage exist in being able to care for the medically discharged at the VA hospitals, too! The VA hospitals are understaffed and lack the funds to properly care for those medically boarded in need of long term care. IMHO, MG Weightman was probably the immediate fall guy for WRAMC.

Again, please don't think poorly of the Army Medical Department, at least at the acute level because we provide the upmost best healthcare to our Soldiers, as well as all other US Armed Forces troops!

Respectfully,
Cary James Barrett, 1LT(P) AN


P.S. My apologies to our members that follow the democratic party line. You are still Americans, for which I defend the right to free speech and the American way of life. Please, understand I believe very strongly in my career as an Army Nurse Corps officer. If, I seem on edge it is because I'm deploying to Iraq within the month with anticipated return in April 2008. My request, you may not support the Bush Administration, but please, please support the US Troops & their dependents. Thank you.
__________________
Cary James Barrett, RN, BSN, CPT, Army Nurse
SoldierNurse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 06:05 PM   #3
Member
 
Neversettle71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 80
Re: We're All at Walter Reed

MagRedC5
:goodjob:
Neversettle71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 08:57 PM   #4
Administrator
 
cougarnurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MidWest area
Posts: 4,829
Blog Entries: 14
Send a message via Yahoo to cougarnurse
Re: We're All at Walter Reed

Before we go bashing whomever is in the White House, realize FDR did the same about PH. Regardless, without our troops and Constitution, we would NOT be able to post like we have been doing.

I just hope we all would stay united for our guys.

'Cat'
cougarnurse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 08:25 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
NavyJim58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 199
Re: We're All at Walter Reed

I understand MagRedC5 taking umbrage following the post by:
Deborah Burger, RN
Huffington Post
March 6, 2007

To me its all politics and about money. I'm glad this came to light so our troops can get better facilities for whatever the reason. I have no doubt the troops were and are receiving quality care at Walter Reed. My wife a critical care manager there from 1994 to 1998. I was at Bethesda and the Pentagon at the same time and visited regularly. Personally I think the general was scapegoated but the brass know if things go south they are likely to take the heat for the politicians. Part of the risk they take for the big responsibility.
thanks for listening.
NavyJim58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 09:15 AM   #6
aKa MagRedC5
 
SoldierNurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Universal City [San Antonio], TX
Posts: 1,288
Send a message via AIM to SoldierNurse
Re: We're All at Walter Reed

Quote:
Originally Posted by NavyJim58 View Post
I understand MagRedC5 taking umbrage following the post by:
Deborah Burger, RN
Huffington Post
March 6, 2007

To me its all politics and about money. I'm glad this came to light so our troops can get better facilities for whatever the reason. I have no doubt the troops were and are receiving quality care at Walter Reed. My wife a critical care manager there from 1994 to 1998. I was at Bethesda and the Pentagon at the same time and visited regularly. Personally I think the general was scapegoated but the brass know if things go south they are likely to take the heat for the politicians. Part of the risk they take for the big responsibility.
thanks for listening.
Have you heard news lately about WRAMC dissolving & Bethesda handling all the healthcare in that area. I heard about this BRAC decision before the recent findings at WRAMC. TIA!
__________________
Cary James Barrett, RN, BSN, CPT, Army Nurse
SoldierNurse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 11:23 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN JOSE
Posts: 169
Thumbs up Walter Reed woes bring turmoil at the top

....serving under leadership tainted by scandal .... :hung: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/03/tnsharvey070302/
mared is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 12:32 PM   #8
aKa MagRedC5
 
SoldierNurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Universal City [San Antonio], TX
Posts: 1,288
Send a message via AIM to SoldierNurse
Exclamation Re: Walter Reed woes bring turmoil at the top

Quote:
Originally Posted by mared View Post
I'm just curious what agenda you have with your post and my Army Medical Dept.?

Yes, the outpatient care/long term care/medical hold care for the wounded needs major reform. However, the cost of the GWOT is huge. Like in the article you referenced, during war money is hard to come by...for many reasons good & bad.

Yet, if your purpose is to disrespect my Commander-in-Chief right before I'm to be deployed to Iraq, please regroup.

Thank you.
__________________
Cary James Barrett, RN, BSN, CPT, Army Nurse
SoldierNurse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 01:22 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
NavyJim58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 199
Re: Walter Reed woes bring turmoil at the top

Don't understand exactly where mared is coming from with the posts so far. Brass at both Walter Reed and the Pentagon have admitted that some mistakes were made and things should have been attended to earlier. It's normal for someone to take the fall and several have been axed. The problems being addressed at Walter Reed are mostly outpatient issues not in-patient hospital issues. The facilities at Walter Reed are old and barely being maintained. It would take billions of dollars to refurbish Walter Reed and keep it open. One of the biggest issues when I was in Washington was maintenance of the facility. The spotlight is on Walter Reed and that only means something good will happen for the troops whether its because some political party wants to get elected or wants to make the other party look bad.

Maj. Gen. Eric B. Schoomaker will be good for Walter Reed and his retired brother Peter was a super supporter of Walter Reed. I assume mared is trying to make some postive statement and not just bashing the military. thanks for listening
NavyJim58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 01:32 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SAN JOSE
Posts: 169
Exclamation

:endof:

Consider this your LAST warning for inappropriate behavior. - MagRedC5
mared is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We're All at Walter Reed mared General Nursing Discussion 5 03-21-2007 09:15 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126