Go Back   Ultimate Nurse > Specialty Nurse Forums > Specialty Nursing Discussion Forum > Critical Care Nursing
Register
Connect with Facebook

Notices

Critical Care Nursing Critical Care, ICU, CVICU, MSICU, CCU... in the trenches!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-26-2005, 11:54 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southeast America
Posts: 225
Adios Swan Ganz

I don't know if it's lack of enthusiasm or brilliant good sense, but the Docs here don't put in many Flow-directed, balloon tip'd, pulmonary artery catheters anymore. Studies show that long term monitoring of PAP/PCWP isn't all that benificial to the patient. If you ever ruptured a pulmonary artery neither you nor the patient is going to have a good day. With the advent of sophisticated echocardiography, most of the info obtained from the Swan can be calculated from the echo. Don't get me wrong, I still think that it is a valuable tool. I work in the Cath Lab from time to time and we still do RHC procedures and calculate CO/CI, systemic and pulmonay resistance, along with valve areas and gradients. The key is we get our sample pressures and get out. I just don't think that the risk justifies the benefit for long term PAP monitoring.

O_S
Old_School is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2005, 06:58 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 54
Re: Adios Swan Ganz

We have commented occasionally in the MICU about the relative lack of Swans as well. It is sometimes doc dependent, but for the most part, the PA cath has gone by the wayside. Infection risk just isn't worth it for the few numbers we get that nobody looks at or cares about anyway.
grapejam88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2005, 09:38 PM   #3
Super Moderator
 
nursinghumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,389
Mood:
Send a message via ICQ to nursinghumor Send a message via AIM to nursinghumor Send a message via Skype™ to nursinghumor
Re: Adios Swan Ganz

For those of you wondering what a Swan Ganz catheter is, Medline Plus Medical Encyclopedia (National Library of Medicine) has an explanation with a few pictures as well.

"Swan-Ganz catheterization involves the passage of a catheter into the right side of the heart to obtain diagnostic information about the heart and to provide continuous monitoring of heart function in critically ill patients."
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/e...cle/003870.htm

Andrew Lopez, RN
http://www.4nursing.com
nursinghumor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2005, 11:00 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Southeast America
Posts: 225
Re: Adios Swan Ganz

[ QUOTE ]
grapejam88 said:
. . . few numbers we get that nobody looks at or cares about anyway.


[/ QUOTE ]

That's really a good point. How many ICU nurses really understand hemodynamics these days. I personally used SVRI to gauge effect to afterload when I would be doing Dobutrex/Nipride titration (pre-enalapril days obviously). PAEDP with the low alarms set, on shocky septic patients that we were fluid resusitating. And I'd watch the wedge pressure when starting a patient on Primacor. Now that was cool to just watch that number just start dropping. If the truth be told, I really liked swans but it seemed like no one else did.

O_S
Old_School is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 06:58 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 8
Re: Adios Swan Ganz

I have not touched a Swan in at least 5 years. We insert TLC and do CVP's now. I think our Swan kit has dust on it now!!!
DMyers
__________________
:houra: If it is to be. It is up to us as nurses. We need to stand together and not point fingers. We need to help each other for the good of our patients.
DMyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2007, 08:54 AM   #6
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coastal New England
Posts: 706
Mood:
Re: Adios Swan Ganz

We utliize the CVP to guide fluid balance in my ICU as well and for the most part, it's adequate. We drive pressors off of cuff pressures too, sometimes several drugs at once which troubles me especially when the patient has vascular disease. We really should use arterial lines. I struggle at times with the resistance to diagnostic use of PA catheters especially when we really aren't sure just what the true fluid status is and when there is renal failure involved. When we do use them, it's short term which is appropriate; float the Swan, see the pressures do the calcs and get out.

R
Ricu is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Ultimate Nurse > Specialty Nurse Forums > Specialty Nursing Discussion Forum > Critical Care Nursing
 
 
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
  • Submit Thread to del.icio.us del.icio.us
  • Submit Thread to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • Submit Thread to Google Google
  • Bookmarks

    Thread Tools Search this Thread
    Search this Thread:

    Advanced Search
    Display Modes






    Invite your friends from Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and tons of other social networks.
    Click Here to Begin!

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134
    Translate this page:
    Albanian Arabic Bulgarian Catalan Chinese Croatian Czech Danish Dutch English Estonian Filipino Finnish French Galician German Greek Hebrew Hindi Hungarian Indonesian Italian Japanese Korean Latvian Lithuanian Maltese Norwegian Persian Polish Portuguese Romanian Russian Serbian Slovak Slovenian Spanish Swedish Taiwanese Thai Turkish Ukrainian Vietnamese